Node.js RPS vs Other Backend Technologies – What's Really Faster?
When choosing a backend tech stack, performance often plays a crucial role — especially when your app needs to scale. One popular metric developers rely on is Requests Per Second (RPS).
In this blog, we'll compare how Node.js stacks up against other backend technologies like Go, Rust, Python, and Java, using real benchmarks, use-case insights, and a simple test setup.
📊What is RPS and Why Does It Matter?
RPS (Requests Per Second) measures how many client requests your server can handle per second. It's a critical metric when:
- ▸
High Traffic Handling
Perfect for e-commerce flash sales and peak traffic periods
- ▸
Real-time Applications
Essential for messaging apps and gaming servers
- ▸
API Scaling
Critical for microservices and distributed systems
But RPS doesn't tell the full story — CPU usage, memory footprint, and developer productivity also matter significantly in real-world applications.
⚙️Test Setup
We simulate a simple "Hello World" API in different backend frameworks and run them using a load testing tool like wrk.
| Tech | Framework | Endpoint | Example Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js | Express | /hello | { message: "Hello" } |
| Go | net/http | /hello | { "message": "Hello" } |
| Rust | Actix Web | /hello | { "message": "Hello" } |
| Python | FastAPI | /hello | { "message": "Hello" } |
| Java | Spring Boot | /hello | { "message": "Hello" } |
📈Benchmark Results
| Language | Framework | RPS | Latency | Memory Footprint |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Go | net/http | 120,000 | Low | Low |
| Rust | Actix Web | 110,000 | Very Low | Very Low |
| Node.js | Express | 40,000 | Moderate | Moderate |
| Java | Spring Boot | 25,000 | Moderate | High |
| Python | FastAPI | 18,000 | Higher | Moderate |
Important Note
The performance readings shown above are approximate and may vary significantly based on: hardware configuration, operating system, network conditions, database setup, concurrent load, framework versions, and optimization techniques used. These benchmarks serve as a general comparison guide rather than absolute performance guarantees.
🧪Example: Node.js Benchmark with wrk
wrk -t4 -c100 -d10s http://localhost:3000/helloNode.js (Express) Sample Code
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
app.get('/hello', (req, res) => {
res.json({ message: 'Hello' });
});
app.listen(3000, () => console.log('Server running on port 3000'));Go (net/http) Sample Code
package main
import (
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"net/http"
)
type Response struct {
Message string `json:"message"`
}
func hello(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(Response{Message: "Hello"})
}
func main() {
http.HandleFunc("/hello", hello)
fmt.Println("Server running on port 3000")
http.ListenAndServe(":3000", nil)
}Rust (Actix Web) Sample Code
use actix_web::{web, App, HttpResponse, HttpServer, Result};
use serde::Serialize;
#[derive(Serialize)]
struct Response {
message: String,
}
async fn hello() -> Result<HttpResponse> {
Ok(HttpResponse::Ok().json(Response {
message: "Hello".to_string(),
}))
}
#[actix_web::main]
async fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
println!("Server running on port 3000");
HttpServer::new(|| {
App::new().route("/hello", web::get().to(hello))
})
.bind("127.0.0.1:3000")?
.run()
.await
}Python (FastAPI) Sample Code
from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel
app = FastAPI()
class Response(BaseModel):
message: str
@app.get("/hello", response_model=Response)
async def hello():
return Response(message="Hello")
if __name__ == "__main__":
import uvicorn
uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=3000)Java (Spring Boot) Sample Code
@RestController
@SpringBootApplication
public class HelloApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(HelloApplication.class, args);
}
@GetMapping("/hello")
public ResponseEntity<Response> hello() {
return ResponseEntity.ok(new Response("Hello"));
}
public static class Response {
private String message;
public Response(String message) {
this.message = message;
}
public String getMessage() {
return message;
}
}
}🏗️Real-World Performance Scenarios
Raw RPS numbers don't tell the complete story. Let's examine how these technologies perform in real-world scenarios:
Database-Heavy Applications
Performance with actual database operations and connection pooling
File Upload & Processing
Handling 1MB file uploads with basic processing
🛠️Development Experience & Ecosystem
| Language | Learning Curve | Package Ecosystem | Dev Tools | Community |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js | Easy | Excellent (npm) | Excellent | Very Large |
| Python | Easy | Excellent (pip) | Good | Very Large |
| Java | Moderate | Excellent (Maven) | Excellent | Very Large |
| Go | Moderate | Good (go mod) | Good | Growing |
| Rust | Steep | Good (Cargo) | Excellent | Growing |
⚡Scaling & Deployment Considerations
Horizontal Scaling
- ✓Node.js: PM2 clustering, easy Docker deployment
- ✓Go: Goroutines handle concurrency well
- ~Python: GIL limitations, needs multiple processes
Memory Usage (Idle)
- Rust (Actix)2-5 MB
- Go (Gin)5-10 MB
- Node.js (Express)15-30 MB
- Java (Spring Boot)60-120 MB
Cold Start Times
- Rust< 10ms
- Go< 50ms
- Node.js100-300ms
- Java1-3 seconds
Build & Deploy Speed
- Node.js~5s
- Python~8s
- Go~15s
- Rust2-5 min
🎯Decision Framework: Which Technology to Choose?
Start with Node.js if:
- ▸You need rapid prototyping
- ▸Building real-time applications
- ▸Your team knows JavaScript
- ▸Moderate traffic (10K-50K RPS)
- ▸Rich ecosystem needed
- ▸Fast development cycles
Choose Go when:
- ▸Performance is critical
- ▸Building microservices
- ▸High concurrency needed
- ▸Cloud-native applications
- ▸Simple, maintainable code
- ▸Docker/Kubernetes deployment
Consider Rust for:
- ▸Maximum performance needed
- ▸Memory safety is crucial
- ▸System-level programming
- ▸Long-term maintenance
- ▸Team has time to learn
- ▸Zero-cost abstractions matter
📝Key Takeaways
Node.js: The Balanced Choice
Node.js strikes an excellent balance between developer productivity, scalability, and ecosystem richness — making it perfect for I/O-bound and real-time applications.
Performance Kings: Go & Rust
When raw performance is your top priority, Go and Rust are the clear winners. However, remember to choose based on your specific use case, team expertise, and project requirements.
Thanks for reading! 🚀