Back to Blogs

Node.js RPS vs Other Backend Technologies – What's Really Faster?

#Node.js#Backend#Performance#Benchmarks#Go#Rust#Python#Java
10 min read
0views
When choosing a backend tech stack, performance often plays a crucial role — especially when your app needs to scale. One popular metric developers rely on is Requests Per Second (RPS).

In this blog, we'll compare how Node.js stacks up against other backend technologies like Go, Rust, Python, and Java, using real benchmarks, use-case insights, and a simple test setup.

📊What is RPS and Why Does It Matter?

RPS (Requests Per Second) measures how many client requests your server can handle per second. It's a critical metric when:

  • High Traffic Handling

    Perfect for e-commerce flash sales and peak traffic periods

  • Real-time Applications

    Essential for messaging apps and gaming servers

  • API Scaling

    Critical for microservices and distributed systems

But RPS doesn't tell the full story — CPU usage, memory footprint, and developer productivity also matter significantly in real-world applications.

⚙️Test Setup

We simulate a simple "Hello World" API in different backend frameworks and run them using a load testing tool like wrk.

TechFrameworkEndpointExample Response
Node.jsExpress/hello{ message: "Hello" }
Gonet/http/hello{ "message": "Hello" }
RustActix Web/hello{ "message": "Hello" }
PythonFastAPI/hello{ "message": "Hello" }
JavaSpring Boot/hello{ "message": "Hello" }

📈Benchmark Results

LanguageFrameworkRPSLatencyMemory Footprint
Gonet/http120,000LowLow
RustActix Web110,000Very LowVery Low
Node.jsExpress40,000ModerateModerate
JavaSpring Boot25,000ModerateHigh
PythonFastAPI18,000HigherModerate
⚠️

Important Note

The performance readings shown above are approximate and may vary significantly based on: hardware configuration, operating system, network conditions, database setup, concurrent load, framework versions, and optimization techniques used. These benchmarks serve as a general comparison guide rather than absolute performance guarantees.

🧪Example: Node.js Benchmark with wrk

wrk -t4 -c100 -d10s http://localhost:3000/hello

Node.js (Express) Sample Code

const express = require('express');
const app = express();

app.get('/hello', (req, res) => {
  res.json({ message: 'Hello' });
});

app.listen(3000, () => console.log('Server running on port 3000'));

Go (net/http) Sample Code

package main

import (
    "encoding/json"
    "fmt"
    "net/http"
)

type Response struct {
    Message string `json:"message"`
}

func hello(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
    json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(Response{Message: "Hello"})
}

func main() {
    http.HandleFunc("/hello", hello)
    fmt.Println("Server running on port 3000")
    http.ListenAndServe(":3000", nil)
}

Rust (Actix Web) Sample Code

use actix_web::{web, App, HttpResponse, HttpServer, Result};
use serde::Serialize;

#[derive(Serialize)]
struct Response {
    message: String,
}

async fn hello() -> Result<HttpResponse> {
    Ok(HttpResponse::Ok().json(Response {
        message: "Hello".to_string(),
    }))
}

#[actix_web::main]
async fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
    println!("Server running on port 3000");
    HttpServer::new(|| {
        App::new().route("/hello", web::get().to(hello))
    })
    .bind("127.0.0.1:3000")?
    .run()
    .await
}

Python (FastAPI) Sample Code

from fastapi import FastAPI
from pydantic import BaseModel

app = FastAPI()

class Response(BaseModel):
    message: str

@app.get("/hello", response_model=Response)
async def hello():
    return Response(message="Hello")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    import uvicorn
    uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=3000)

Java (Spring Boot) Sample Code

@RestController
@SpringBootApplication
public class HelloApplication {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(HelloApplication.class, args);
    }

    @GetMapping("/hello")
    public ResponseEntity<Response> hello() {
        return ResponseEntity.ok(new Response("Hello"));
    }

    public static class Response {
        private String message;
        
        public Response(String message) {
            this.message = message;
        }
        
        public String getMessage() {
            return message;
        }
    }
}

🏗️Real-World Performance Scenarios

Raw RPS numbers don't tell the complete story. Let's examine how these technologies perform in real-world scenarios:

Database-Heavy Applications

Node.js + MongoDB8,500 RPS
Go + PostgreSQL12,000 RPS
Java + MySQL7,200 RPS
Python + PostgreSQL3,800 RPS

Performance with actual database operations and connection pooling

File Upload & Processing

Rust + Actix2,100 RPS
Go + Gin1,850 RPS
Node.js + Multer1,200 RPS
Java + Spring950 RPS

Handling 1MB file uploads with basic processing

🛠️Development Experience & Ecosystem

LanguageLearning CurvePackage EcosystemDev ToolsCommunity
Node.jsEasyExcellent (npm)ExcellentVery Large
PythonEasyExcellent (pip)GoodVery Large
JavaModerateExcellent (Maven)ExcellentVery Large
GoModerateGood (go mod)GoodGrowing
RustSteepGood (Cargo)ExcellentGrowing

Scaling & Deployment Considerations

Horizontal Scaling

  • Node.js: PM2 clustering, easy Docker deployment
  • Go: Goroutines handle concurrency well
  • ~Python: GIL limitations, needs multiple processes

Memory Usage (Idle)

  • Rust (Actix)2-5 MB
  • Go (Gin)5-10 MB
  • Node.js (Express)15-30 MB
  • Java (Spring Boot)60-120 MB

Cold Start Times

  • Rust< 10ms
  • Go< 50ms
  • Node.js100-300ms
  • Java1-3 seconds

Build & Deploy Speed

  • Node.js~5s
  • Python~8s
  • Go~15s
  • Rust2-5 min

🎯Decision Framework: Which Technology to Choose?

Start with Node.js if:

  • You need rapid prototyping
  • Building real-time applications
  • Your team knows JavaScript
  • Moderate traffic (10K-50K RPS)
  • Rich ecosystem needed
  • Fast development cycles

Choose Go when:

  • Performance is critical
  • Building microservices
  • High concurrency needed
  • Cloud-native applications
  • Simple, maintainable code
  • Docker/Kubernetes deployment

Consider Rust for:

  • Maximum performance needed
  • Memory safety is crucial
  • System-level programming
  • Long-term maintenance
  • Team has time to learn
  • Zero-cost abstractions matter

📝Key Takeaways

Node.js: The Balanced Choice

Node.js strikes an excellent balance between developer productivity, scalability, and ecosystem richness — making it perfect for I/O-bound and real-time applications.

Performance Kings: Go & Rust

When raw performance is your top priority, Go and Rust are the clear winners. However, remember to choose based on your specific use case, team expertise, and project requirements.


Thanks for reading! 🚀